Evidence earns its place.

Two separate questions

Evidence confidence asks how much a study supports a specific claim. Source verification asks whether we have retrieved and checked the cited source. A checked source can still be weak evidence; an unresolved source cannot support a new recommendation.

Strong evidence

Consistent, applicable findings from credible research; confidence remains claim-specific.

Promising evidence

Encouraging findings with meaningful limits in replication, precision or applicability.

Early evidence

Small or exploratory studies, indirect outcomes or populations; no automatic protocol change.

Expert practice

A reasoned coaching approach, explicitly distinguished from a demonstrated effect.

Speculation

An untested explanation or hypothesis, not a recommendation.

What a research note must show

The research question, design and population; the finding and its size; limitations; relevance to ultra endurance; practical implications; what remains uncertain; direct sources and actual publication dates. Practical summaries must not be stronger than the evidence beneath them.

Authorship and review

Published by Miles of Meaning. The current collection was assembled with AI assistance for the original project and contains outstanding source-verification gaps. It is not represented as clinician-reviewed or independently peer-reviewed editorial work. Named authors and reviewer credentials are added only when verified.

Corrections and independence

Substantive changes are dated and explained in the change history. A branding update never counts as a research review. Personal experience and opinion are labelled separately. Any future sponsorship must be disclosed; payments do not determine evidence ratings. There are currently no ads, memberships or tracking scripts.

Source verification register · Corrections and history

Editorial workflow

1. Draft with primary sources and stated scope
2. Verify claim, publication date, study population, effect and limitations
3. Record named author and consent to publish profile
4. Record reviewer identity, relevant credentials and review date when reviewed
5. Check bilingual meaning, numeric doses and stop rules
6. Publish with confidence separate from verification
7. Record corrections with before, after, reason and source

Miles of Meaning is an independent publication operated privately by Miclel Metekohy in the Netherlands. Contact

The private operator is confirmed. Article authorship and independent review remain separately verified; no medical-review badge is implied by operator identity.