Trail shoes: what the evidence measures
· 1 min read
First published:
Research through: 14 August 2026
A review first published on 8 August mapped sixteen footwear studies in trail running and hiking. It examines the evidence base rather than ranking shoes.
Selected research available by this Friday; older studies are background, not weekly discoveries. Assessed in October 2026; screening was not exhaustive.
Topics: Training
Finding
Most included studies focused on trail running rather than hiking.
Limitations: The two activities are not interchangeable populations.
Evidence level: Moderate evidence
- Exploring the Role of Footwear in Trail Running and Hiking: A Scoping Review (opens in a new tab) · · Research from this week
Finding
Biomechanics was the most frequently studied outcome domain.
Limitations: Movement measures are not the same as race performance or injury prevention.
Evidence level: Moderate evidence
- Exploring the Role of Footwear in Trail Running and Hiking: A Scoping Review (opens in a new tab) · · Research from this week
Finding
Evidence about prolonged footwear use and its interaction with fatigue remained limited.
Limitations: The review cannot select a universally best ultra shoe.
Evidence level: Moderate evidence
- Exploring the Role of Footwear in Trail Running and Hiking: A Scoping Review (opens in a new tab) · · Research from this week
Interpretation
A change in biomechanics does not by itself establish faster races or fewer injuries. The review does not identify a best shoe or a proven fatigue solution.
Further reading: current guides
Update history
- · Historical edition researched, translated and assessed in October 2026; Friday publication date retained.
Copy the site guide and this page. Paste into your AI and ask naturally.